r+d

Posts on innovation, user experience, research and design 
Filed under

inspiration

 

A digital park bench

Like many others, I've been a long-time fan of The Sartorialist. I didn't know much about the man behind the camera, but this video from Intel changed that. I love this concept of the Internet as a digital park bench.
 
Because the Internet is the world shrinking. Are we all becoming too homogenized? Milan hasn't changed. Paris hasn't changed, New York hasn't changed. So I don't think it's really homogenized anything, but I do think it's given us what I like to call a digital park bench. So many people you meet say 'Oh I love to just go people watch, to just go sit in the park and watch people. And before, you were limited to the people you could see right there in front you, at your park. Now, you can go on the internet and really the whole world is open to you now.

via 

Filed under  //   Internet   The Satorialist   art   inspiration   photography   startup  

Comments [0]

Discovering products

Sx70

Matt at 37Signals dug this quote up out of a post on Cult of Mac. It recounts John Sculley's meeting with Steve Jobs in which Steve described his meeting with Edwin Land, the inventor/ founder of the Polaroid camera:

Dr Land was saying: “I could see what the Polaroid camera should be. It was just as real to me as if it was sitting in front of me before I had ever built one.”

And Steve said: “Yeah, that’s exactly the way I saw the Macintosh.” He said if I asked someone who had only used a personal calculator what a Macintosh should be like they couldn’t have told me. There was no way to do consumer research on it so I had to go and create it and then show it to people and say now what do you think?”

Both of them had this ability to not invent products, but discover products. Both of them said these products have always existed — it’s just that no one has ever seen them before. We were the ones who discovered them. The Polaroid camera always existed and the Macintosh always existed — it’s a matter of discovery. 

I think the exchange is outstanding on so many levels, not the least of which in the way it quietly denigrates customer research, particularly customer research, for the purposes of breakthrough products or services. For incremental change, it's great. You're polling the audience for feature enhancements. That's right in the market research wheelhouse. But when it comes to breakthrough change . . . as Henry Ford famously said, "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said a faster horse."

For revolutionary change, you need someone, or a team of people, who not only understand the specific value denials that need to be addressed but who also have the creative prowess and technical expertise to engineer the right solution. But for people who can do this, people who have been tinkerers and inventors their whole lives, it's not as hard as it might sound. They've been working on turning ideas into real things for years. It's just a part of who they are.

They just know how to make the right thing because they've done it before. Even if it's new to the world, they can see it plain as day right in front of them. Those products have always been there, waiting on their moment to be discovered. And once discovered, all that's left is the small matter of breathing life into them and polishing them for inspection by the world.

image via

Filed under  //   Apple   Edwin Land   Polaroid   Steve Jobs   breakthrough innovation   design   innovation   inspiration   market research  

Comments [2]

Work and creativity. . .

As a creative person, you've been given the ability to build things from nothing by way of hard work over long periods of time. Creation is a deeply personal and rewarding activity, which means that your work should also be deeply personal and rewarding. If it's not, then something is amiss.

Creation is entirely dependent on ownership.Ownership not as a percentage of equity, but as a measure of your ability to change things for the better. To build and grow and fail and learn. This is no small thing. Creativity is the manifestation of lateral thinking, and without tangible results, it becomes stunted. We have to see the fruits of our labors, good or bad, or there's no motivation to proceed, nothing to learn from to inform the next decision. States of approval and decisions-by-committee and constant compromises are third-party interruptions of an internal dialog that needs to come to its own conclusions.

via kottke via Ben Pieratt

Filed under  //   creativity   entrepreneurship   innovation   inspiration   motivation  

Comments [0]